G.Ganesh, S/O.Gopal v. The District Collector,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.09.2017 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.17490 of 2017 G.Ganesh ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The District Collector, Ramanthapuram District.
2.The Member Secretary, Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu, 116-A, Periyar EVR High Road, Nehru Park, Chennai - 600 084.
3.The District Sports Officer, Tamil Nadu Sports Development Authority, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapurm.
... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to take appropriate action based on petitioner representation dated 16.06.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Md.Mohideen, Addl.Govt.Pleader
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) This writ petition has been filed in public interest. 2.The petitioner is a resident of Ramanathapuram District. The Government of Tamil Nadu inaugurated the Seethakathi Sethupathi Stadium at Tamanathapuram. It is the grievance of the writ petitioner that though the stadium was put up by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Government, certain private clubs have taken over the same and are indulging in collection of exorbitant fees from those who want to play or practice Tennis in the stadium premises. It is alleged that a sum of Rs.25,000/- is collected from those who want to play in the Tennis Court in the said stadium. He therefore gave a representation dated 16.07.2017 in this regard. Since no action was taken, the present writ petition came to be filed. 3.When the matter was taken up for disposal, the learned Special Government Pleader submitted before this Court that the third respondent has taken over the stadium and that rates as prescribed by the Government alone will be collected. There is no room for allowing the private clubs to occupy the stadium premises and indulging in any illegal collection. 4.
The learned Special Government Pleader made the said submission on the strength of the communication bearing Na.Ka.No.33/2017, dated 18.09.2017 issued by the third respondent. Since the third respondent has made it clear that the stadium would be managed as per the advice rendered by the first and second respondents herein and that the ground can be utilised after payment of fees fixed by the Government, there is no need for any further factual adjudication in the matter. 5.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Ramanthapuram District. 2.The Member Secretary, Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu, 116-A, Periyar EVR High Road, Nehru Park, Chennai - 600 084.
3.The District Sports Officer, Tamil Nadu Sports Development Authority, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. +One cc to Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthick, Advocate, SR.No.79642 skm/Arul RL/5C/2P/JC/SAR1/10/10/2017 W.P(MD)No.17490 of 2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 19.09.2017