Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14683/2021dismissed as infructuous

Muthiah.M v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-10-27Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

W.P(MD)No.14683 of 2021 iBEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.10.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P.(MD) No.14683 of 2021 M.Muthiah ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police (Crime), Austinpatti Police Station, Madurai.

3.R.Santharam Subbu 4.Kalaiselvi ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to issuenecessary direction to the second respondent to take appropriate action on petitioner's complaint dated 20.10.2020 made to the second respondent on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2021 made to the first respondent. For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This writ petitioner is filed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to take appropriate action against the respondents 3 and 4 on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner on 20.10.2020.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 04.10.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal.' However, on that day the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based upon the complaint given by the petitioner enquiry was undertaken in CSR No.369 of 2021 and the same is pending.

3. Today when the matter is taken up hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the parties have entered into compromise for which the first installment was also paid.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P(MD)No.14683 of 2021

4. It appears that compromise was entered into between the parties on 20.10.2021 and part of the amount has also been received and after that this petition came to be filed stating that the complaint must be properly enquired.

5. Even though the matter has been listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioner. However, in view of the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) CM To, 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police (Crime), Austinpatti Police Station, Madurai.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

W.P.(MD) No.14683 of 2021 27.10.2021 TSK(CO) KB(19.11.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2