Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11729/2021disposed of

R.Senthilkumar v. The Commissioner Of Police

2021-08-18Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11729 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11729 of 2021 R.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai District.

3.Yasin Jaweri 4.Ganesan ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Neelamegam For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor.

For R1 and R2

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is a land broker, third respondent approached him to purchase land. In respect of which, agreement was entered between them. As per the agreement, the third respondent had to pay balance sale consideration of Rs.51 lakhs, but later fourth respondent returned the above said advance amount of Rs.16,00,000/- because the third respondent did not come forward to settle the said transaction. The third respondent is making allegations against the petitioner before the second respondent, the second respondent directs the petitioner to pay Rs.50,000/- to the third respondent and also harassed the petitioner. Hence, the present petition has been filed.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, enquiry was undertaken in C.S.R.No.527 of 2019. During the course of enquiry, the petitioner himself given an undertaking to pay the balance amount to the third respondent on or before 29.07.2021. Based on the under taking given by the petitioner, the case was closed by observing that it is a purely civil dispute.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11729 of 2021

4. In view of the above submission, nothing survives for further consideration in this matter. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, since the petitioner himself has agreed to pay the amount. There is no question of harassment at this stage. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tta Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.K.NEELAMEGAM, Advocate ( SR-26714[F] dated 18/08/2021 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11729 of 2021 18.08.2021 RK (31.08.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2