Madras High CourtCRL MP(MD)/5511/2020closed

Sahana v. Nayeem Ahamed

2021-04-16Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

CRL MP(MD) No.5511 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of April Two Thousand and Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL MP(MD) No.5511 of 2020 IN CRL OP(MD) No.10414 of 2019 SAHANA ... PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Vs 1 NAYEEM AHAMED 2 MUZEER AHAMED 3 NAATHIM 4 AAYISHA 5 NASIMA 6 VAHITHA 7 SAIRA 8 JARINA BEGUM ...RESPONDENTS 1 TO 8/ PETITIONERS 1 TO 8 9.THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.11 of 2019 ...RESPONDENT No.9/RESPONDENT Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to cancel in bail granted in CRL OP(MD)No.10414 of 2019 dated 05.05.2020 on the file of this Hon`ble Court in favour of the respondents 1 to 8 herein and thus render justice. Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.V.KARUNA, Advocate for the petitioners and of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL MP(MD) No.5511 of 2020 Mr.NAYEEM AHAMED, Party in Person and of Mr.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)for 9th Respondent and Respondents 2 to 8 not appeared either in person or by an advocate, the court made the following order:- Reserved on 17.02.2021 Pronounced on : 16.04.2021 Since the parties are together, there is no need to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent herein. Recording the submission of Mr.Nayeem Ahamed that he has reunited with his wife, this criminal miscellaneous petition is closed. sd/- 16/04/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, DINDIGUL.

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.V.KARUNA, Advocate ( SR-3137[I] dated 16/04/2021 ) ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.5511 of 2020 IN CRL OP(MD) No.10414 of 2019 Date :16/04/2021 skm MS/VR/SAR-2/22.04.2021/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2