P.Arivi v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.06.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN P.Arivi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul District.

3.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to change the patta in the name of the petitioner which was unlawfully changed in the name of the 3rd parties in Survey No. 265/4B. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Addl. Government Pleader.

1/4

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The third respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The third respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, on notice before passing final order. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or the other. 3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. 27.06.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias 2/4

To:- 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul District.

3.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias 27.06.2024 4/4