V.Arokiadoss @ Jayamadhavan, v. The Tahsildar,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD)No.18053 of 2017 V.Arokiadoss @ Jayamadhavan : Petitioner

Versus

1.The Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Thiruvadanai, Ramnad District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station, Thiruvadanai, Ramnad District.

3.Jayaraj 4.Muthu : Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner's complaint dated 09.09.2017 and thereby, direct him to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to cultivate his agricultural land situated in Survey No.31/1134/4B comprising in Patta No.70 of Panichakudi Group, Nedumaram Village, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramnad District. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Vaigunth For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor *****

O R D E R

Today, when the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted that the relief sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Recording the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) SML To 1.The Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Thiruvadanai, Ramnad District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station, Thiruvadanai, Ramnad District.

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.18053 of 2017 Dated: 26.06.2019 BUC(05/07/2019)2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/