← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20923/2018granted

Madasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-11-27Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of November Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.20923 of 2018 1.MADASAMY 2 BALUSAMY 3 ARUMUGAM 4 LAKSHMANAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Nos.2,3,4&7 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUTHUKULATHUR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(IN CRIME NO. 139 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.V.MAHARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate(Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 336, 353, 332 and 307 IPC, in Crime No.139 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 15.11.2018, there was a communal clash between two groups. When the defacto complainant was on duty for keeping peace in the locality, during funeral procession, the petitioners forming an unlawful assembly. Since the defacto complainant was prevented from doing his duty, there seems to have been some dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioners, in which, the petitioners along with other accused said to have attacked the defacto complainant by knife stick and threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners have preferred a complaint before the respondent police for similar

nature of offence, which has been registered in Crime No.138 of 2018, since it is a counter case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent police submitted that investigation is pending. 5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur, Ramanathapuram District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that: [a] if the petitioners fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.

[b] the petitioners are directed to stay at Kadalur and report before the Inspector of Police, Kadalur Police Station, daily at 10.30.am., until further orders.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 27/11/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUTHUKULATHUR, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUTHUKULATHUR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADALUR POLICE STATION, KADALUR.

5.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.V.MAHARAJAN Advocate SR.No.22216

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20923 of 2018 Date :27/11/2018 AE/VR MMS/SAR1/04.12.2018/3P/7C