Rabin v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.06.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Rabin ... Petitioner -vs1.The Commissioner Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Limited 3A, Aavin Illam Pasumpon Muthuramalinganar Salai Nandhanam, Chennai-600 035 2.The General Manager Tiruchirapalli District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd., Pudukottai Road Kottapattu, Kaja Nagar Post Tiruchirapalli-620 023 3.The General Manager Thoothukudi District Milk Co.

Producer's Union Ltd., Vagaikulam Srivaikundam Highway Road Aniyaparanallur Village Thoothukudi-628 851

4.The General Manager Perambalur Ariyalur District Milk Co-Producers Union Ltd., RTD-144, Padalur East Village Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District-621 109 ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned transfer order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No. 6237/PO.NI.2024, dated 13.03.2026 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 & 2 to transfer the petitioner to the third respondent's office in the light of the Government Order issued by the Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department in G.O.(Ms) No.107 of 2020, dated 03.09.2020, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Karunanidhi For Respondents :

Ms.K.Porkodi Counsel for the Government for R1 Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu for R3

O R D E R

Ms.K.Porkodi, learned counsel for the Government, takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu, learned counsel, takes notice for the third respondent.

2. In view of the orders proposed to be passed, notice to the respondents 2 & 4 is dispensed with.

3. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Government appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent.

5. Though this writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned transfer order, learned counsel for the petitioner restricted the relief only to the extent of directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 30.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner.

6. While the petitioner was working as Technician (Boiler) at the third respondent Union, he was transferred through the impugned proceedings to the fourth respondent Union. Aggrieved by the said transfer order dated 13.03.2026, the petitioner claims to have submitted a representation dated 30.03.2026 to the respondents claiming the benefits

granted under G.O.(Ms) No.107, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department, dated 03.09.2020. While the said representation was pending, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. While so, the petitioner was once again stated to have been transferred from the fourth respondent Union to the second respondent Union through proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.6237/Po.Ni./2024, dated 23.05.2026. In the light of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case if the representation dated 30.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner claiming the benefits of the Government Order in G.O.(Ms) No.107, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department, dated 03.09.2020, is considered, the grievance of the petitioner is likely to be redressed by the respondents themselves. Hence, he requested for appropriate direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 30.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner before the first respondent and to pass orders thereon.

7. Learned counsel for the Government appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent have also expressed that appropriate directions can be issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and to pass appropriate orders thereon.

8. In the light of the above, without going into the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the representation dated 30.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner duly taking into consideration the beneficial orders issued in G.O.(Ms) No.107, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department, dated 03.09.2020 and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

01.06.2026 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No krk To:

The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Limited, 3A, Aavin Illam, Pasumpon Muthuramalinganar Salai, Nandhanam, Chennai-600 035.

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

krk 01.06.2026