Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18717/2017disposed of

Maruthaiya v. The District Collector,

2017-10-09Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.10.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD) No.18717 of 2017 Maruthaiya ... Petitioner vs.

1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District.

2.The Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to carry out the petitioner's name in the computer data entry for grant of patta with regard to S.F.No 798/35 measuring 0.01.0 ares and S.F.No.798/35 of Karayur Village, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District at the earliest. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the second respondent to carry out the petitioner's name in the computer data entry for grant of patta with regard to S.F.No 798/35 measuring 0.01.0 ares and S.F.No.798/35 of Karayur Village, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

2.The case of the petitioner is that patta was granted to the petitioner in respect of the property in S.F.No 798/35 measuring 0.01.0 ares and S.F.No.798/35, but the second respondent failed to carry out the petitioner's name in the computer data entry. Hence, the petitioner has given a representation to the second respondent. Since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner is before this Court with the above prayer. 3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that if a reasonable time is granted to the respondents, the representation of the petitioner will be considered and suitable orders passed.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.09.2017 and pass appropriate orders thereon one way or other on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With the above direction, this petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District.

2.The Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

+1cc to M/S.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate SR.No. 82113 +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 82090 W.P(MD) No.18717 of 2017 09.10.2017 MJ JM/MR KKR/SAR 1/23.10.2017/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/