← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14923/2021disposed of

Pownraj v. The Secretary To Government

2021-08-23Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.08.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.(MD) No. 14923 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.11822 of 2021 Pownraj .. Petitioner Vs

1. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, St. George Fort, Chennai.

2. The District Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3. The Commissioner, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the files of the third respondent pertaining to its notice bearing Na.Ka.No.1313/2020/F1 dated 26.07.2021 and to quash the same and consequently, directing the respondents to grant alternative site to the petitioner considering the fact that the petitioner is residing in the said area for more than 60 years by considering the request of the petitioner dated 10.08.2021 and not to evict the petitioner till alternative arrangement are made. For Petitioner :

Mr. S.C. Herold Singh For Respondents : Mr. B. Saravanan, Government Advocate, for R1 and R2

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] The petitioner says that the petitioner has been a resident whether by himself or through his predecessors for nearly 60 years

at the same place and challenges the present attempt to evict the petitioner from Government land.

2. Since the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate any modicum of right to be entitled to remain on Government property and the right of the petitioner appears to be no better than an encroacher, no relief can be extended to the petitioner. At the same time, the Government is reminded of its duty to provide shelter for those who do not have any.

3. Since the writ petitioner does not indicate any right to remain at the property in question, the petitioner will have to vacate the same and the notice issued in such regard to the petitioner does not call for any interference. The petitioner should vacate the premises within the next two months to enable the respondents to maintain the sanctity of Government land.

4. It is made clear that the Government's consideration of the petitioner's request for any alternative site will have nothing to do with the petitioner's immediate obligation to take himself away from the Government land that he purports to occupy without any modicum of right.

5. W.P.(MD).No. 14923 of 2021 is disposed of without any order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.11822 of 2021 is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) mnr Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, St. George Fort, Chennai.

2. The District Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3. The Commissioner, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

+1 CC to M/s.S.C.HEROLD SINGH, Advocate ( SR-26970[F] dated 23/08/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-27028[F] dated 24/08/2021 ) W.P.(MD) No. 14923 of 2021 23.08.2021 RD(31.08.2021) 3P 6C