Thoubeek Ali v. The Superintendent Of Police
WP(MD)No.14997 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WP(MD)No.14997 of 2021 Thoubeek Ali ... Petitioner vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rameswaram Sub Division, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Mandapam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
...Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the rowdy list/history sheet in H.S.No.333 of 2013 pending on the file of the third respondent police station considering the petitioner's representation dated 09.08.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Veerakumar For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthilkumar, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3
ORDER
The petitioner has been figuring in the rowdy list/history sheet maintained by the third respondent. Seeking deletion of his name from the history sheet, this writ petition has been filed. 2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that after 2017, the petitioner has not come under the adverse notice of the respondents. He would also state that every year in the month of December a review is undertaken. Since the petitioner has not come under any adverse notice of the respondents for more than two years, the respondents are directed to delete the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
WP(MD)No.14997 of 2021 name of the petitioner from the history sheet when the annual review is undertaken.
3.This writ petition is allowed on these terms. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) skm Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rameswaram Sub Division, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Mandapam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.T. VEERAKUMAR, Advocate (SR-34806[F] dated 17/11/2021) WP(MD)No.14997 of 2021 16.11.2021 (CO) GC(01.12.2021) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2