← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12043/2020dismissed

Mariyamma @Mariyammal v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-11-04Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.12043 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/11/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.12043 of 2020 Mariyamma @ Mariyammal ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Aranthangi Police Station, Pudukottai District.

(Crime No.1339 of 2020). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.T.Lenin Kumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Ms.M.AnanthaDevi, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1339 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner is a sole accused apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C. and Section 21(1), 21(2) of Tamil Nadu Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation)Act, 1957, in Crime No.1339 of 2020, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner said to have illegally transported 1/4 Unit of river sand using bullock cart. Hence, a case has been registered.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.12043 of 2020

4. In view of the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.13334 of 2020 etc., batch, dated 03.09.2020 by the Principal Bench of this Court at Madras, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 04/11/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARANTHANGI POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12043 of 2020 Date :04/11/2020 KSA SRS/JC/SAR-II/18.11.2020/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2