← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/1716/2018allowed

Muthu Irul, v. The Secretary To Government,

2019-06-03Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi7 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF THE MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE : 03.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI H.C.P. (MD) NO. 1716 OF 2018 Muthu Irul ... Petitioner - Vs -

1. The Secretary to the Government State of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition & Excise Dept.

Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2. The District Collector & District Magistrate Office of the District Collector & District Magistrate, Madurai City Madurai.

3. The Superintendent of Prison Madurai Central Prison, Madurai Dist.

... Respondents Petition filed for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus calling for the entire records connected with the detention order of the 2nd respondent in BCDFGISSSV No.09/2018 dated 27.11.2018 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu by name Muthu Irul, S/o Kannan, aged about 25 years, now detained at Madurai Central Prison, before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr. R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu, Addl. Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.Sathyanarayanan, J.) The detenu himself is the petitioner and challenge is made to the impugned order of detention dated 27.11.2018 passed by the 2nd respondent u/s 3 (1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-leggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982) branding him as 'Goonda' with a view to preventing him from acting prejudicial to the interest of public health and public order. Aggrieved by the said order, the present petition has been filed.

2. As per the grounds of detention dated 30th Dec., 2011, the detenu came to adverse notice of the following cases :- S .

N o .

Police Station & Crime No.

Se ct io n of La w Disposal/Present Stage Madurai City C5, Karimedu Police Station Cr.

No.177/2 IP The complainant Sudagar, S/o Arulanandam, resident of Door No.87, Sivanthipuram 14th Street, Aathumedu, Virudhunagar District, now residing at Door No.7-A, Harvey Nagar, Madurai, came to Karimedu Police Station and lodged a complaint as follows. He owns a TATA INDIGO car bearing registration No.TN 67 BD 0338 and driving for rent in Friends Call Taxi, Madurai. On 14.3.2017 at 21.20 hours he was coming in front of a timber shop in Bye-pass road. At that time one Muthu Irul and his associate Sanmuganathan came in a two wheeler at his back side and parked the two wheeler near him. They picked Lava IRIS X8 cell phone and Rs.300/- from his shirt pocket, escaped and ran away. In this connection a case was registered in Madurai City Karimedu Police Station Cr. No.177/2017 u/s 379 IPC.

On 15.03.2017, Karimedu Police Station police officials were checking vehicles near Vaigai river southern side road junction, Madurai Kamarajar bridge. At that time Muthu Irul came on that way and in a two wheeler bearing registration No.TN 58 AB 1532. On suspicious, police officials caught hold and enquired him. Muthu Irul told that he is going to meet his associate Sanmuganathan. He is going to sell the Lava IRIS X8 cell phone robbed from Sudagar by both of them. He spent the amount of Rs.300/- robbed from Sudagar by consuming liquor. He steals the two wheeler from Sagayamadha Kovil Street, Madurai City, in which he came. The accused Muthu Irul arrested and remanded under judicial custody. The accused Muthu Irul filed bail petition in Cr. M.P. No.779/2017 and he was granted bail by the Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Madurai, on 03.04.2017. In this case, charge sheet was filed before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Madurai , vide C.C. No.46/18. The case is pending trial before the court.

Sholavan dan P.S.

Cr.

No.307/2 IP The complainant Muthulakshmi, W/o Anbarasan residing at Alangkottaram, Sholavandan was going with her husband in front of K.S.Sabeena house situated near AG Church, Meenakshi Nagar in Sholavandan to Nagari road. At that time Muthu Irul and his associate Arvind @ Raja came in a two wheeler and snatched gold chain weighing 2 1⁄2 soverign from her neck and pushed her down and they escaped. In this connection a case was registered in Sholavandan Police Station Cr. No.307/18 u/s 392 IPC. In this case, the accused Muthu Irul was arrested on 23.10.18 at 18.15 hours, in Sholavandan Government Hospital. He was admitted as in-patient for further treatment in Madurai Government Rajaji Hospital in ward No.90B.

As per the orders of Vadipatti Judicial Magistrate Court, the accused Muthu Irul was remanded under judicial custody in CONVICT ward No.111, Madurai Government Rajaji Hospital for 10 days from 24.10.18 and then the accused Muthu Irul was remanded at Dindigul Sub jail from 03.11.2018 under judicial custody. His remand was lastly extended till 30.11.2018. He has filed bail petition in Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti, vide Cr. M.P. No.4002/2018 on 12.11.2018 and the same is pending in the Court. The case is under investigation.

Sholavan dan P.S.

Cr.

No.317/2 @ & (b ) IP In this cae, the complainant Natarajan, S/o Gopalan, is residint at N.G.O. Colony, Salem Road, Namakkal District. On 15.10.18, at 16.30 hours, he started in TARAS lorry bearing registration No.TN 48 F 4758 belonging to J.J. Transport Company loading 480 Nos., of dhal bags from Salem Market Goodshed. On 16.10.18 at midnight he parked the lorry for nature call near Jeyajothi Foods, Nagari in service road Dingidul to Madurai Four way track and then he was checking the lorry tyres. At that time the accused Muthu Irul and his associates Araving @ Raja, Jeyasuriya @ Suriya, Muthukumar @ Karuppu, Adithyakarthik @ Adhi, threatened the complainant with deadly weapons. They tied his hand and legs with clothes and pushed him in thorn and bush area and they drove the lorry. They went towards Trichy in four way track.

They watched that police officials were checking vehicles near Aristo roundana, Trichy. They parked the lorry at road side and absconded. On knowing the information, the Inspector of Police, Sholavandan Police Station rescued the complainant. In this connection a case was registered in Sholavandan Police Station Cr. No.317/18 u/s 392 IPC @ 397, 120 (b) IPC. The lorry was brought to the police station along with the load. In this case, the absconded accused Jeyasuriya @ Suriya was arrested on 19.10.18 at Nagari. The accused Muthukumar @ Karuppu, Adhithyakarthik @ Adhi were arrested on 19.10.18 at Dindigul. The accused were remanded under judicial custody. In this case, the accused Muthu Irul was arrested on 23.10.18 at 18.15 hours, in Sholavandan Government Hospital.

He was admitted as inpatient for further treatment in Madurai Government Rajaji Hospital in ward No.90B. As per the orders of Vadipatti Judicial Magistrate Court, the accused Muthu Irul was remanded under judicial custody in CONVICT ward No.111, Madurai Government Rajaji Hospital for 10 days from 24.10.18 and then the accused Muthu Irul was remanded at Dindigul Sub jail from 03.11.2018 under judicial custody. His remand was lastly extended till 30.11.2018. The accused Muthu Irul has filed a bail petition in Vadipatti Judicial Magistrate Court vide Cr. MP No.4005/2018 dated 12.11.2018 and the same was dismissed by Court on 13.11.2018. The accused Muthu Irul has filed another bail petition in Principal District and Sessions Court vide Cr. M.P. No.5757/2018 dated 20.11.2018 and the same is pending in the Court.

The case is under investigation.

3. It is further stated in the grounds of detention that the defacto complainant Karnan, S/o Ayyanar is a resident of Alangkottaram, Sholavandan, has lodged a complaint on the file of the Sholavandan Police Station alleging among other things that he and his friend Malaiyandi were returning to Alangkottaram from Sholavandan and when they were coming near 7th Day Church, the detenu dashed against the complainant's two wheeler and the complainant fell down. The detenu brandished a sword and put the same on his neck and threatened to kill him and in that process, asked the complainant to part with the money and also took a sum of Rs.1,500/- from his shirt pocket and also snatched the wrist watch. The defacto complainant raised an alarm and few persons came there and the detenu, threatening them also, and fled from the scene of occurrence during which time, he fell down and sustained injuries.

4. The Sholavandan police, on receipt of the complaint from the defacto complainant, registered a case in crime No.325/2018 for the offence u/s 392 r/w 397 IPC and 506 (ii) IPC (ground case). The detenu was arrested at about 18.15 hours on 23.10.2018 and was admitted as in-patient and, thereafter, shifted to Government Rajaji Hospital, for further treatment and, subsequently produced before the Court and as per the orders of the Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, remanded to judicial custody in Convict Ward No.111 for 10 days from 24.10.18 and, subsequently, remanded to judicial custody and lodged in sub-jail from 3.11.18. The remand was further extended upto 30.11.2018.

5. The 2nd respondent/Detaining Authority, on being satisfied that the above stated activities of the detenu are prejudicial to public order and peace, has clamped the impugned order of detention, challenging which the present habeas corpus petition has been filed.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner drew the attention of this Court to the grounds of detention and submitted that admittedly the detenu was in custody in connection with the 2nd and 3rd adverse cases as well as in the ground case and he filed application for bail in connection with the ground case in Cr. M.P. No.4003/2018 before the Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti and the same was dismissed on 13.11.18 and the detenu filed yet another application before the Principal District and Sessions Court, Madurai in Cr. M.P. No.5253/18 and the same is pending.

The primordial submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the detenu is also in judicial custody in connection with the 2nd and 3rd adverse cases, admittedly, he did not file any application for bail and even for the sake of argument the detenu is likely to come out on bail in the ground case, still he is in custody in connection with the 2nd and 3rd adverse cases and, therefore, there is no real and imminent possibility of the detenu coming out on bail causing detriment to the maintenance of public order and peace.

remand of the detenu in the 2nd and 3rd adverse cases and this exhibits total non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority and, thereby, warranting quashment of the detention order.

7. Per contra, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submits that the detaining authority, after due application of mind to the entire materials has arrived at the subjective satisfaction and clamped the order of detention and, therefore, submits that no interference is called for with the impugned order and prays for dismissal of this petition.

8. This Court has carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record.

9. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the detenu is in custody in connection with the 2nd and 3rd adverse cases and he did not file any application of bail, however, while arriving at the subjective satisfaction that there is likelihood of the detenu indulging in similar activities, which are prejudicial to the maintenance of public order and peace, the detaining authority did not take into consideration the arrest and incarceration of the detenu in connection with the 2nd and 3rd adverse cases and, therefore, non-consideration of the same would exhibit non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority. This non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority, in the considered opinion of this Court, vitiates the order of detention and warrants interference.

10. Accordingly, the habeas corpus petition is allowed and the impugned order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent in BDFGISSSV No.09/2018 dated 27.11.2018 is set aside. The detenu Muthu Irul, S/o Kannan, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his custody/detention is required in connection with any other case/proceedings.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (w) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To

1. The Secretary to the Government State of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition & Excise Dept.

Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2. The District Collector & District Magistrate Office of the District Collector & District Magistrate, Madurai City Madurai.

3. The Superintendent of Prison Madurai Central Prison, Madurai Dist.

4. The Joint Secretary to Govt., Public(Law&order), Fort st. geroge, Chennai 9

5. The Addl. Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai.

+1.CC. To Mr. R.Alagumani, Advocate in SR No.66951 H.C.P. (MD) NO. 1716 OF 2018 03.06.2019 gln MK (28.06.2019) 7P 7C