Madras High CourtWP(MD)/19657/2017disposed of

P.Muniyammal, v. The District Collector

2017-10-26Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :26.10.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.19657 of 2017 P.Muniyammal .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai, Karur District.

3. The Thasildar, Taluk Officer, Tharagampatty,Kadavoor Taluk, Karur District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent herein to include the S.No.136/3B in patta No.696, Adangal in the Computer Revenue Records consequently issue the same to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr K.Asok Kumar Ram For Respondent : Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Government Pleader

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking to direct the third respondent to include the S.No.136/3B in patta No.696 and Adangal in the Revenue Records.

2.According to the petitioner, her father in law purchased the property in S.No.136/3B on 12.08.1961 and later on settlement deed in M.R.4/195/5861, dated 19.01.2004 has been executed in her favour and the joint patta also reflects her family members and her name. While so, in the year 2015, the S.No.136/3B was removed from the revenue records. The petitioner in order to include the survey number in the patta and revenue records sent a representation to the respondents on 31.08.2017. But, so far no https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

action has been taken by the respondents. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court, seeking a direction to the respondent in respect of her claim.

3.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the representation of the petitioner would be considered on merits within the time stipulated by this Court.

4.Considering the limited scope of the relief sought, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the petitioner to produce the documentary evidence in support of her claim before the third respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and upon such production, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 31.08.2017, after affording due opportunity to the petitioner and also to the interested parties, if any and pass necessary orders within a period of six weeks therefrom.

5.With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai, Karur District.

3. The Thasildar, Taluk Officer, Tharagampatty,Kadavoor Taluk, Karur District.

+ 1 cc TO Mr.K.Asok kumar Ram , Advocate in SR No. 83698 dsk AE/SV MMS/SAR3/09.11.2017/2P/5C ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.19657 of 2017 26.10.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/