Pandi @ Sarayapandi @ Suryapandiarajan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02/11/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.12126 of 2020 Pandi @ Sarayapandi @ Suryapandiarajan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Tirchy District.

Cr.No. 101 of 2019. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.Pandiyaraj, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Erottuchamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 101 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.09.2019 for the offences punishable under Section 392 and 397 of IPC on the file of the respondent police seeks bail.

2. Earlier the petitioner was granted bail and subsequently the petitioner failed to appear before the trial court hence Non Bailable Warrant was issued. Thereafter the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.09.2019, hence seeking bail the present application is filed.

3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side)would submit that petitioner herein was secured after much difficulty and if he is released on bail, he will indulge in similar types of offences again. He would also submit that 18 previous cases are pending against him.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side), this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Hence the petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 02/11/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRAETE No.6, TRICHY.

2. DO-THROUGH: THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHIRAPPALLI.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AIRPORT POLICE STATION, TIRCHY DISTRICT.

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12126 of 2020 Date :02/11/2020 AAV TE/AKM/SAR-III : 04/11/2020 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/