Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/938/2020disposed of

D.Gabril v. Ponmudi

2020-12-21Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy2 pages

Cont.P(MD).No.938 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Cont.P(MD) No.938 of 2020 in W.P(MD).No.4176 of 2020 D.Gabril ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Mr.Ponmudi Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kum) Ltd., New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District-612 001.

2.Mr.Jebaraj Navamani, General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kum) Ltd., New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam Region, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District-612 001.

... Contemnors/ Respondents PRAYER : This Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish respondents herein for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P (MD) No.4176 of 2020 dated 28.02.2020.

Prayer in WP(MD). 4176/ 2020 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court directing the respondents to settle the petitioner surrender leave salary for 110 days in respect of the years 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 together with interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum payable from the date of retirement to till the date of actual payment.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Contemnors : Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan Standing Counsel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Cont.P(MD).No.938 of 2020

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Contemnors/respondents would submit that the order of this Court in W.P(MD) No.4176 of 2020, dated 28.02.2020 has been duly complied with. 2.Recording the said submission, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cp Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. Cont.P(MD) No.938 of 2020 SVN(CO) KK(11.01.2021) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2