Pitchaiammal v. Meenakshi

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 16.07.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN 1.Pitchaiammal 2.Dhanalakshmi 3.Dhanalakshmi ... Appellants -vs1.Meenakshi 2.Kumar 3.Elamathi 4.Kittammal 5.Murugesan 6.Kavitha 7.Rajendra Prasad 8.Chinnappa Gounder 9.M.R.Thangavel ..Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.08.2018 made in A.S.No.3 of 2015 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Karur reversing the Judgment and decree dated 02.01.2014 made in O.S.No.135 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Karur. For Appellant ... Mr.V.Nagarajan For Respondents ... Mr.K.Gunasekaran (for R9) R1 to R8 dismissed 1/3

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the first appellant died long ago, and appellants 2 and 3 have also passed away. Despite being informed about the second appeal, the legal representatives have not turned up to substitute them on record. In this regard, the learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo.

2. Recording the same, this second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

16.07.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:

1.The Principal Sub Judge, Karur.

2.The Additional District Munsif, Karur.

3.The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

2/3

G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

skn Judgment made in 16.07.2025 3/3