Madras High CourtREV.APLW(MD)/169/2024disposed of

Nagarajan. V v. S.Meena

2024-10-29Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.10.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN V.Nagarajan ... Review Applicant / 3rd Respondent Vs.

1.S.Meena ... 1st Respondent / Petitioner 2.The Thasildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.

3.The Taluk Surveyor, Dindigul West, Dindigul Taluk Office, Dindigul District. ... Respondents 2 & 3 / Respondents 1 & 2 PRAYER: Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., praying to review the Judgment and decree passed in W.P. (MD)No.5302 of 2024 dated 06.03.2024 by allowing the above review application.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Azhagesh 1/4

For Respondent : Mr.V.Vishnu for R1 : Mr.R.Ragavendran Government Advocate for R2 & R3 COMMON ORDER The first respondent herein filed W.P.(MD)No.5302 of 2024 for conducting survey. The writ petition was disposed of by me by issuing the usual direction. Seeking review of the said order, dated 06.03.2024, this revision application has been filed.

2. The order passed by me in fact protects the review applicant's right. Whatever objection that may be submitted by the review applicant shall be taken into account and order shall be passed by the second respondent expeditiously. The second respondent in the event of overruling the petitioner's objection shall give breathing time to the review applicant. In other words, the second respondent is obliged to strictly abide by the direction given by this Court vide order dated 06.03.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.5302 of 2024.

2/4

3. The review application is disposed of accordingly. No costs. 29.10.2024 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No rmi To 1.The Thasildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.

2.The Taluk Surveyor, Dindigul West, Dindigul Taluk Office, Dindigul District.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

rmi 29.10.2024 4/4