Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14519/2020dismissed as infructuous

S.Sathishkumar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2022-03-24Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.03.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2020 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.6826 of 2020 S.Sathish Kumar ... Petitioner/ Defacto Complainant Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, Theni District.

(Crime No.2018 of 2020).

3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, Theni District.

... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to transfer the investigation in Crime No.2018 of 2020 pending on the file of the third respondent to some other competent officer subordinate to the first respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.A.Dhana Aravindha Balaji For Dhana Law Associates For Respondents : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.2018 of 2020 on the file of the third respondent. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the third respondent completed the investigation in Crime No.2018 of 2020 and also filed a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam and the same has been taken cognizance in C.C.No.127 of 2021 on 10.12.2020.

3. In view of the above, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2020 is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ps Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, Theni District.

3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, Theni District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.14519 of 2020 24.03.2022 MGJ(12.04.2022) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2