← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15352/2018ordered

Reshma Dawood, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-09-18Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.15352 of 2018 RESHMA DAWOOD ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.7 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 506(i) I.P.C, in Crime No.7 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner received a sum of Rs.12,00,000/- from the defacto complainant after giving false promise that he would arrange job for him. Hence, the complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that it is a case of job racketing and the investigation is pending.

5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakh only) to the credit of Crime No.7 of 2018 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar. On https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

such deposit, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 18/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, VIRUDHUNAGAR.

2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate SR.No.17838

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15352 of 2018 Date :18/09/2018 msa AE/JC/SAR4/25.09.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/