Madras High CourtWP(MD)/10297/2016disposed of

Kumarasamy v. The Distirct Collector

2016-06-10Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.06.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P(MD)No.10297 of 2016 Kumarasamy ... Petitioner -vs1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District 3.The Tahsildar, Aranthangi Taluk Pudukottai District 4.The Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station, Pudukottai District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.04.2016 in the light of the proceeding of 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.2833/2015/A4 dated 25.04.2016 and take appropriate steps to initiate proceedings as per law to ensure peace, law and order in Pandikudi Village, Periyaloor Circle, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.D.Muruganandam, Addl. Govt. Pleader.

O R D E R

It is an application seeking direction to the respondents to pass orders in view of the representation dated 13.04.2016.

2. Mr.D.Muruganandham, Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The petitioner claims that they are the owners of the land to an extent of 2 ares in SF No.2/9 and an extent of 1 Acre 63 cents. The

defendants are stated to be the rival group in the same village and it is alleged that they are creating law and order problem and they finally demolished the Pillayar Temple.

5. A complaint was lodged before the police and based on the complaint of the petitioner, the 4th respondent has registered two cases under Section 107 Cr.P.C. and forwarded the same to the 2nd respondent. The proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C. also was initiated by the 2nd respondent and both the parties seem to have executed a bond to the 2nd respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though, proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C. have been initiated, the rival groups, without any regard to law and order problem, creating law and order problems and the respondents are not taking required action and that made them to file a representation dated 13.04.2016.

6. Under such circumstances, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitoner dated 13.04.2016, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, based on the available materials with them, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. Sd/ Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar.

To 1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District 3.The Tahsildar, Aranthangi Taluk Pudukottai District 4.The Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station, Pudukottai District. +1CC to M/S.M.Suresh, Advocate, SR.No. 29574 +1CC to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No.29782 ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.10297 of 2016 10.06.2016 RR AM/AAL.MPA/SAR-II/13.06.2016/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/