Vanathi.R v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.12.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI R.Vanathi

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Uthmar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, S.M.Salai, Thanjavur 613 007.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 07.02.2023 within a specified time frame, based on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that not getting Bhavanisagar Training is not the mistake of the employee and it is the mistake of the department. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Visvalingam For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner with a grievance that she has not been sent for Bhavanisagar training and thereby her promotion has been affected has filed this writ petition seeking appropriate direction to the respondents. 2.When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending this writ petition, the petitioner has undergone the said training and subsequently she has also been promoted as Inspector and therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.

3.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. No costs. 03.12.2025 DSK 2/4

To 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Uthmar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, S.M.Salai, Thanjavur 613 007.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI.J., DSK 03.12.2025 4/4