M.Ravi v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9775 of 2019 1.M.Ravi ... Petitioners/ Accused No.1 & 2 Vs.

1.The State Rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, M.Reddiyapatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

...Respondent/Complainant

(Crime No.85/2019) 2.Banumathi

...Respondent/

De-facto Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records in Cr.No.85 of 2019, on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal and devoid of merits.

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Vishnuram For Respondents : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 : Mr.C.Senthilmurugan for R2

O R D E R

The second respondent is the defacto complainant in Crime No.85 of 2019 registered on the file of the first respondent for the offence under Sections 294(b), 354 A, 342, 323, 324 and 506 (ii) of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, to quash the same, this criminal original petition has been filed.

2.The second respondent present in person before this Court. She stated that she has no objection for quashing the impugned FIR and that the matter has been amicably settled. I am therefore of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

view that no purpose will be served by keeping the FIR alive. Hence, the impugned FIR stands quashed and the criminal original petition is allowed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To:

1.The Sub Inspector of Police, M.Reddiyapatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

2.The additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.G.VISHNURAM, Advocate SR-75333.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9775 of 2019 11.07.2019 CS(12.09.2019) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/