Madras High CourtWP(MD)/15240/2021disposed of

Sathyaprakash v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-09-24Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.15240 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.09.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P.(MD)No.15240 of 2021 Sathyaprakash

...Petitioner

/Vs./ State Represented by its 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy,Trichy District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Trichy District.

4.K.Arunachalam

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second and third respondents from interfering in the money dispute between the petitioner's father and the fourth respondent by way of conducting Kattapanchayat, based on the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash Babu For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R4 : Mr.R.Chandrasekar

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed forbearing the second and third respondents from interfering in the money dispute between the petitioner's father and the fourth respondent by way of conducting Kattapanchayat, based on the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2021.

2. On earlier occasion, i.e., on 25.08.2021, when the matter was taken up for hearing on 25.08.2021, it was observed that since there was a money dispute between petitioner and the fourth respondent herein, a direction was issued to the third respondent to close the enquiry by advising the parties to work out their remedy before proper civil forum.

3.Today, when the matter is taken up hearing, the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) circulated the copy of the closure https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.15240 of 2021 report, wherein, it has been stated that with regard to the money dispute, they were advised to work out their remedy through proper civil proceedings and based upon which, the complaint has been closed on 23.09.2021.

4.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate(crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out their remedy before the civil forum. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cp Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy,Trichy District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Trichy District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.M.SUBASH BABU, Advocate ( SR-30542[F] dated 28/09/2021 ) W.P.(MD)No.15240 of 2021 24.09.2021 SRR(CO) KB(11.10.2021) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2