Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/1211/2021allowed

Thankan, v. Chandrika,

2022-03-07Honourable Mrs Justice S.Ananthi (Retd.)3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Monday, the Seventh day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.ANANTHI 1.Thankan, Son of Late Nallathampi, Thettivilai Puthuvai Veedu, Arumanai, Vellamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

2. Pushpanjali, Wife of Late Micheal, Chettichatthalai Vilai Veedu, Nediasalai, Arumanai, Vellamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

3. Alocious, Son of Late Micheal, Chettichatthalai Vilai Veedu, Nediasalai, Arumanai, Vellamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

4. Anusha, Daughter of Late Micheal, Chettichatthalai Vilai Veedu, Nediasalai, Arumanai, Vellamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

5. Ancy, Daughter of Late Micheal, Chettichatthalai Vilai Veedu, Nediasalai, Arumanai, Vellamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

6.Ahino, Son of Late Micheal, Chettichatthalai Vilai Veedu, Nediasalai, Arumanai, Vellamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District ... Petitioners / Defendant Nos.5 to 10 .Vs.

1 CHANDRIKA, WIFE OF LATE GOPI, DOOR NO. 2/106, SUJITHRA, BHAVAN, THETTIVILAI VEEDU, ARUMANAI,, VELLAMCODE VILLAGE, VILAVANCODE TALUK,, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT ..

1st Respondent / Plaintiff 2 G. SUDHEER KUMAR, SON OF LATE GOPI, SUJITHRA BHAVAN,, THETTIVILAI VEEDU, ARUMANAI, VELLAMCODE, VILLAGE, VILAVANCODE TALUK, KANYAKUMARI, DISTRICT.

3 G. SUNIL KUMAR, SON OF LATE GOPI, SUJITHRA BHAVAN,, THETTIVILAI VEEDU, ARUMANAI, VELLAMCODE, VILLAGE, VILAVANCODE TALUK, KANYAKUMARI, DISTRICT.

1/3

4 G. SUMITH KUMAR, SON OF LATE GOPI, SUJITHRA BHAVAN,, THETTIVILAI VEEDU, ARUMANAI, VELLAMCODE, VILLAGE, VILAVANCODE TALUK, KANYAKUMARI, DISTRICT..

5 G. SUJITH KUMAR, SON OF LATE GOPI, SUJITHRA BHAVAN,, THETTIVILAI VEEDU, ARUMANAI, VELLAMCODE, VILLAGE, VILAVANCODE TALUK, KANYAKUMARI, DISTRICT ..

2nd Respondent to fifth respondent / 1st Defendant to 4th defendants Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records in O.S. No.87 of 2020 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai strike the said O.S. No.87 of 2020.

DECREE:- This Civil Revision Petition coming on for hearing on Wednesday the twenty third day of February, Two Thousand Twenty Two upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.K.N.THAMBI, Advocate for the Petitioners and of M/s.J.ANANTHAVALLI, Advocate for the respondents, the petitioner having filed the Fees Certificate vide USR No.7243 dated 11.03.2022, and having stood over for consideration till this date, this Court doth order and decree as follows:-

(1) That the Plaint in O.S. No.87 of 2020 on the file of the subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai be and is hearby struck off and this Civil Revision Petition is allowed.

(2) That the costs of the Civil Revision Petition is Rs.12,840/- (Rupees Twelve thousand eight hundred and forty only)

(3) That there be no costs in this Petition.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To

1) The Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai.

2/3

Copy to:

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 2 Copies +1 CC to M/s.K.N.THAMPI, Advocate ( SR-10701 dated 08/03/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.J.ANANDHAVALLI, Advocate ( SR-10408 dated 07/03/2022 ) MEMORANDUM OF COSTS Court Fee - Vakalath - Batta - Enclosure - Advocate Fee - 12,150 (As per Rule 12(1) rw Rule 3(2)(b) of the legal Practitioners' Fees Rules 1973) ----------- Total 12,840 ---------- (Rupees Twelve thousand eight hundred and forty only) ORDER DATED : 07/03/2022 ========================== DECREE ========================== Allowing the Civil Revision Petition to call for the records in O.S. No.87 of 2020 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai and as stated therein etc., RD(08.04.2022) 3P 6C 3/3