Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21060/2017disposed of

Arulmighu Angayee Amman v. The District Collector

2017-11-15Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.11.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.21060 of 2017 Arulmighu Angayeeamman Deity and Temple, Natchiarpalayam, Woraiyur, Trichy - 3.

Represented by its Trustee, V.Shanmugam, S/o.S.Vaidyanathan ... Petitioner -vs1. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.

2. The Tahsildhar, Taluk Office, Cantonment, Trichy - 1.

3. The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Cantonment, Trichy - 1.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.08.2016 and direct the respondents to mutate the revenue entry in respect of the property obtaining in T.S.No.3, Block No.7, Ward No.C in an extent of 11774 sq.ft. In favour of Arulmighu Angayeeamman Deity and Temple, Natchiarpalayam, Woraiyur, Trichy -3. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Singan For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Government Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.08.2016 and direct the respondents to mutate the revenue entry in respect of the property obtaining in T.S.No.3, Block No.7, Ward No.C in an extent of 11774 sq.ft. In favour of Arulmighu Angayeeamman Deity and Temple, Natchiarpalayam, Woraiyur, Trichy -3. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, learned Government Advocate takes notice for R1 & R2 and Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan for R3. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The case of the petitioner is that he has submitted a representation dated 20.08.2016 through his counsel in the form of a legal notice to the respondents for mutation of records in respect of the property in question. Since the said representation has not been considered so far, the petitioner is before this Court with the above prayer.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into account the limited scope of the relief sought for by the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.08.2016, which is in the form of a legal notice and pass suitable orders thereon on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested parties, if any.

5. With the above direction, this petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:

1. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.

2. The Tahsildhar, Taluk Office, Cantonment, Trichy - 1.

3. The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Cantonment, Trichy - 1.

+ 1 CC TO Mr.N.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 87346 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 87614 AR TE/KP/SAR-4 : 24/11/2017 : 2P/6C W.P(MD)No.21060 of 2017 15.11.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/