P.Gomathi, W/O.K.Harikumar v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24.06.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P(MD)No.11254 of 2016 P.Gomathi .. Petitioner vs.

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Koilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

4.P.Santha .. Respondents PRAYER:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to forbear the fourth respondent not to ply in the route permitted to the petitioner by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 03.06.2016. For Petitioner :Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandhran For Respondents :Mr.T.R.Janarthanam, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the Petitioner Mrs.P.Gomathai, who is the holder of a Mini Bus and a Stage carrier permit, in the name and style of "Lakshmi Mini Bus", was also given the benefit of renewing the said permit by the second respondent in his proceedings in R.NO.2942/C1/2016-PSC No.11/TUTY/2016, dated 09.02.2016 for the route Kovilpatti Bus Stand to Alampatti via Lakshmi Mill, Maniyachi Vilakku, Thonukal Vilakku, Alampatti. When the said Mini Bus was plying in the permitted route for the past ten years without any violation, the fourth respondent is also running a Stage Carrier Mini Bus Service in the name and style of S.S.R.B.S. Mini Bus. But, they are unnecessarily violating the permit by entering into the permitted route of the petitioner. Therefore, a representation was given to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the respondents 1 to 3 to forbear the respondents not to ply in the permitted route of the petitioner.

2. Heard the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record.

3. After perusing the representation, this Court is not able to appreciate the problem of the petitioner. For, nowhere in the representation, dated 03.06.2016, it is mentioned the date or timing on which the fourth respondent has been plying the vehicle entering into the permitted route of the petitioner. When the representation sought to be disposed of is bereft of any particulars, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition.

In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Koilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

+1cc to Special Government Pleader SR.No.33102 sm:GSV-PM:06.07.2016:2P/5C W.P.(MD)No.11254 of 2016 24.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/