P.M.A Fairose Beevi v. The State Represented By The

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI P.M.A.Fairose Beevi ... Petitioner versus

1. The State represented by the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District - 630 562.

2. The Inspector of Police, (Law & Order) Ilayangudi Police Station, Ilayangudi Town & Taluk, Sivagangai District - 630 702.

3. The Managing Trustee, Ilayangudi Nesau Pallalai Thozhuhai Medai Pallivasal, No.15, Kamarajar Salai, Ilayangudi Town & Taluk, Sivagangi District - 630 702.

5. M.Kadher Rasool 1/5

6. Jalaludeen @ Ahamed Jalal

7. Munaf Basheer Ahamed

8. Saleem ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent herein to provide the police protection/police aid for the petition property viz., bearing Door No.9, situated at Packer Rowther Street, Ilayangudi Town & Taluk, Sivagangai District for petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition property by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.05.2025 within the period as stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.L.Ragesh Bhagavath For R1 and R2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner, seeking police protection, has moved this writ petition.

2/5

2. It appears that the petitioner is a tenant of the 3rd respondent and she is having an issue with regard to the tenancy. The petitioner claims that she has already filed a suit before the Waqf Tribunal, Chennai and also obtained an interim order. Despite the interim order granted by the Waqf Tribunal, the 3rd respondent has attempted to evict the petitioner forcibly. Therefore, the petitioner has lodged a complaint before the respondent Police and also filed this writ petition seeking police protection.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that it is a dispute between the tenant and landlord and it is purely civil in nature. Therefore, they have not interfered with the same and they cannot provide police protection. He further submits that the petitioner's complaint was enquired and the same was closed advising the petitioner to workout her remedy before the Waqf Tribunal. 3/5

4. Since the petitioner has already filed a suit before the Waqf Tribunal, Chennai, this writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy before the Waqf Tribunal, Chennai. No costs.

18.06.2025 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District - 630 562.

2. The Inspector of Police, (Law & Order) Ilayangudi Police Station, Ilayangudi Town & Taluk, Sivagangai District - 630 702.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 18.06.2025 5/5