← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12340/2020ordered

Mohammed Yusuf v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-11-04Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/11/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

1. Mohammed Yusuf

2. Mohammed Yamin ... Petitioners/Accused Rank Not Known Vs The State through, The Inspector of Police, Veeracholan Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

Crime No.Not known /2020 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.S.J.Chakkaravarthy, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.KR.Bharathi Kannan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. Not known/2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused(Rank not known), apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b) and 506(ii)of IPC, in Crime No.not known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners said to have abused the defacto complainant by using filthy language and also criminally intimated him. Hence, the complaint. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely 1/3

implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, submitted that no injury was caused to the defacto complainant and the petitioners are not having previous case. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no injury was caused to the defacto complainant and the petitioners are not having previous case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure his identity;

(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused/petitioners thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 04/11/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2 DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERACHOLAN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY, Advocate SR.No.7290

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12340 of 2020 Date :04/11/2020 DSS PK/AKM/SAR-IV/18.11.2020 : 3P/6C 3/3