Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13081/2021dismissed as infructuous

K.Mohandoss v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-09-07Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13081of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.09.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13081of 2021 K.Mohandoss ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

4.Mr.Kumaravel 5.Santhosh ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the 3rd respondent herein not to harass the petitioner and not to interfere in the civil dispute and act in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothibasu For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side)

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking direction to the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry in respect of the civil dispute that is pending between the petitioner and the private respondents herein.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the 4th respondent is the own brother of the petitioner herein. In respect of the family property dispute, the 4th respondent has given a complaint, based upon which, the official respondents are pressurizing this petitioner, who is a senior citizen, aged about 80 years.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that no complaint has been received against this petitioner so far from any of the private respondents herein. Only on the basis of the representation made by https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13081of 2021 this petitioner, enquiry was undertaken and during the course of enquiry, the 2nd respondent appears to have advised the petitioner to workout his remedy before the appropriated Court through appropriate civil proceedings. Based upon that advise, the complaint came to be closed on 08.06.2021. Since the representation made by this petitioner has been closed by giving the aforesaid advise, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this petition. Hence, the question of harassment at the hands of the official respondents does not arise.

4.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side), this petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.G.M.LAW OFFICE, Advocate (SR-28427[F] dated 07/09/2021) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13081 of 2021 07.09.2021 RS (20.09.2021) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2