Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21893/2017disposed of

S.Thiruppathy, v. The Chairman,

2019-03-25Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.21893 of 2017 S.Thiruppathy .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chairman, T.N.Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai - 08.

2.The Chairman, Recruitment Sub Committee, Seethakathi Sethupathy Stadium, Collectorate Complex, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to reassess the petitioner mark in the Rope Climbing event held at Seethakathi Sethupathy Stadium, Ramanathapuram and further direct the 1st respondent to select and appoint the petitioner as Grade-II Police Constable in pursuance to his participation in the selection for Combined Recruitment of Grade-II Police Constable/Grade-II Jail Warder/Fire Man - 2010.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.C.M.Mari Chelliah Prabhu Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to re-assess the petitioner's mark in the Rope Climbing event held at Seethakathi Sethupathy Stadium, Ramanathapuram and further direct the 1st respondent to select and appoint the petitioner as Grade-II Police Constable.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The case of the petitioner is that he had participated in the physical efficiency test before the second respondent on 13.10.2010 for the post of Grade II, Police Constable, in which, he reached the level of two star standard, but he has been given one star standard. The grievance of the petitioner is that if he has been given two star standard, he would have been selected for the said post. Seeking such relief, he made a representation dated 19.07.2017 to the respondents. Since the same has not been considered, this writ petition has been filed. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present position of the petitioner's representation is not known to the petitioner and therefore, the representation submitted by him may be directed to be considered by the respondents. 5.In such view of the matter, the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.07.2017 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) mj 1.The Chairman, T.N.Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai - 08.

2.The Chairman, Recruitment Sub Committee, Seethakathi Sethupathy Stadium, Collectorate Complex, Ramanathapuram.

+1 CC to M/s.R.J.KARTHICK, Advocate ( SR-56477[F] dated 26/03/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-56554[F] dated 26/03/2019 ) ( SR-57157[F] dated 27/03/2019 ) W.P(MD)No.21893 of 2017 25.03.2019 ES/KK/15.04.2019/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/