Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12962/2020allowed

Kannadhasan v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-07Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12962 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12962 of 2020 1.Kannadhasan 2.Sakthivel 3.Sugumar 4.Sabari @ Sabarinathan 5.Sakthi @ Sakthivel 6.Panneerselvam 7.Eabu @ Deniyal 8.Dinesh 9.Kumar 10.Arun 11.Periyannan 12.Sabari @ Saravanan 13.Prabu @ Prabakaran 14.Santha ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 14 vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Vathalai Police Station, Vathalai, Trichy District.

(Crime No.462 of 2020) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Gopi ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.462 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Prabhu For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.M.Silambarasan

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for records relating to the FIR in Crime No.462 of 2020 on the file of 1st respondent police and quash the same.

2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 14 are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12962 of 2020 respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioner would pray for quashing the FIR in Crime No.462 of 2020 on the file of 1st respondent police. 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today (07.12.2020) and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.462 of 2020 on the file of 1st respondent police, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CSII) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

ENCL:Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To 1)The Inspector of Police, Vathalai Police Station, Vathalai, Trichy District.

2)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.K.ARUNRAJ, Advocate ( SR-24744[F] dated 09/12/2020 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12962 of 2020 07.12.2020 MJ(CO) KB(28.12.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2