Vairamani v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.11.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Vairamani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, Karur District.
2.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District.
3.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals Department, Karur District.
4.The Inspector of Police, Vangal Police Station, Karur District.
.. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the petitioner's Bullock Cart seized on 11.08.2020 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.10.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Santhanam Rajeshkumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramar Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
(This writ petition is heard through Video Conference) This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to release the petitioner's Bullock Cart seized by the fourth respondent on 11.08.2020, to the petitioner.
2. Mr.C.Ramar, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondents. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is an agriculturist and he is having a bullock cart for the purpose of carrying goods for agricultural activities. According to him, on 11.08.2020, the fourth respondent seized the bullock cart and registered a case in Crime No.382 of 2020 under Section 379 of IPC, r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, alleging that the petitioner has transported the sand illegally in his bullock cart. According to him, ever since the 1/3
seizure, the said bullock cart is still in the custody of the fourth respondent and till date, no confiscation proceedings has been initiated against the seized bullock cart.
4. It is also the contention of the petitioner that the bullock cart has also not been produced by the fourth respondent before the concerned Jurisdictional Court. According to him, the seized bullock cart is kept idle in the fourth respondent premises in the open place and exposed to the vagaries of nature, resulting in the bullock cart depreciating in value.
5. According to the petitioner, he gave a representation to the respondents on 24.10.2020 for releasing of the seized bullock cart back to him. According to him, the respondents have failed to respond to the said representation. In such circumstances, he has filed this Writ Petition seeking for release of the seized bullock cart.
6. Admittedly, the bullock cart was seized by the fourth respondent on 11.08.2020 and registered a case in Crime No.382 of 2020 under Section 379 of IPC, r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, alleging that the petitioner has transported sand illegally in his bullock cart. Admittedly, the bullock cart is now in the fourth respondent premises and kept in the open place and exposed to the vagaries of nature and has also not been produced before the Jurisdictional Court.
7. As rightly contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the bullock cart will certainly depreciate in value, if it is allowed to remain in the open place and kept idle for a long period of time. No useful purpose will be served if the bullock cart is allowed to be kept idle. In similar matters, this Court has granted release of seized vehicles to the respective petitioners subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. Therefore, this Court is inclined to grant similar relief to the petitioner subject to fulfillment of the following conditions:- (i)the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.3,000/-(Rupees Three Thousand only) in favour of the first respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(ii)the petitioner shall not use the bullock cart for any illegal activities.
(iii)before releasing the bullock cart, the police authority shall take photographs of the bullock cart at the cost of the petitioner.
(iv)As and when the respondents call for the bullock cart for enquiry, the petitioner has to produce the bullock cart in question and he shall cooperate with the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents. 2/3
8. Upon completion of the above mentioned formalities, the respondents shall release the bullock cart to the petitioner forthwith and without any delay. If this undertaking given by the petitioner is breached, the petitioner will not be entitled for interim release of the bullock cart in the future.
9. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CSII) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, Karur District.
2.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District.
3.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals Department, Karur District.
4.The Inspector of Police, Vangal Police Station, Karur District.
+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-21595[F] dated 09/11/2020 ) 06.11.2020 KG(CO) KB(11.11.2020) 3P 6C 3/3