Rangarajan Narasimhan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6605 of 2019 Rangarajan Narasimhan ... Petitioner/ Petitioner-in-Person vs.
1.The Inspector of Police, Manachanallur Police Station, Manachanallur, Trichy.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jeeyapuram Police Station, Trichy.
3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Manachanallur Police Station, Manachanallur, Trichy.
4.Jayaraman Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Shri Ranganatha Swamy Temple, Srirangam, Trichy - 620 006.
5.V.S.Jayabal 6.S.Velumani 7.M.S.Arumugam Superintendent, Shri Ranganatha Swamy Temple, Srirangam, Trichy - 620 006.
8.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Dept. 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
9.Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI Head Office, Plot No.5-B, CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003.
... Respondents/Respondents 10.Paneer Selvam ... Respondent/ Defacto Complainant 1/3
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records in the First Information Report in Manachanallur Police Station Crime No.144 of 2019 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.Rangarajan Narasimhan Party-in-Person For Respondents : Mr.R.Sivakumar Government Advocate (Crl. side) for R1 to R3 and R8 Mr.M.Saravanan for R4 & R7 Mr.R.Anand for R10
O R D E R
This criminal original petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Crime No.144 of 2019 and quash the same.
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 21.12.2021, the petitioner appearing party-in-person has filed a copy of the final report and also the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, accepting the final report and granting liberty to the defacto complainant to file a private complaint if any within two months. At that juncture, the learned counsel for the defacto complainant sought time for getting instructions.
3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today (20.01.2022), the learned counsel for the 10th respondent/defacto complainant would submit that the defacto complainant has received the RCS notice.
4.It is evident from the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate that after service of notice, the defacto complainant has entered into appearance and at his instance, the matter was adjourned for his objections, but after taking some adjournments, he has not turned up nor filed his objections. Thereafter, the learned Judicial Magistrate, has passed an order dated 14.10.2020, accepting the final report and gave liberty to the defacto complainant to file a private complaint, if any within two months. 5.As rightly contended by the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), since the negative report was accepted by the learned Judicial Magistrate, nothing survives for further adjudication.
2/3
6.Recording the above, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) csm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The Inspector of Police, Manachanallur Police Station, Manachanallur, Trichy.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jeeyapuram Police Station, Trichy.
3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Manachanallur Police Station, Manachanallur, Trichy.
4.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Dept. 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.M.SARAVANAN, Advocate ( SR-1969[F] dated 21/01/2022 ) and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6605 of 2019 20.01.2022 NSN(CO) GC(08.02.2022) 3P 7C 3/3