Valanadu v. 1. Kannappan (Died) 2. K.Devi Alias Sakunthala

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 15.10.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN & THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA Rev.Aplc.(MD).Nos.200 & 203 of 2025 Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.200 of 2025:

Valanadu ... Review Petitioner /versus/

1. Kannappan (Died).

2. K.Devi @ Sakunthala,

3. N.Rani,

4. S.Rama.

5. N.Radha, ... Respondents/Respondents 1 to 5/ L.R's of 1st respondent Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.203 of 2025:

Valanadu ... Review Petitioner/Appellant 1st respondent /versus/

1. S.Rama.

... 1st Respondent/Petitioner & LR of 2nd respondent

2. Kannappan (Died).

3. K.Devi @ Sakunthala,

4. N.Radha,

5. N.Rani, ... Respondents 2 to 5/Respondents 3 to 5 Page No.1/4

Prayer in Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.200 of 2025:- Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rules 1 & 2 and Section 114 of C.P.C., 1908, pleased to review the common judgment passed in C.M.A.(MD).No.411 of 2021, dated 08.04.2025 by this Hon'ble Court.

Prayer in Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.203 of 2025:- Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rules 1 & 2 and Section 114 of C.P.C., 1908, pleased to review the common judgment passed in C.M.A.(MD).No.412 of 2021, dated 08.04.2025 by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vijayasethupathy. in both cases COMMON ORDER Heard the Learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks to review the common judgment passed by this Court in C.M.A.(MD).No.411 & 412 of 2025, dated 08.04.2025, in connection with the guardianship of the minor. The arguments placed by the Learned Counsel is an attempt to re-agitate the case again afresh, after passing of the common judgment. Page No.2/4

3. This Court had categorically made an observations that, in case of guardianship, the welfare of the minor is predominant. We have interacted with the minor and found that appeal to be dismissed, subject to limited right of visitation granted to the petitioner herein (i.e., father). The review applications do not disclose any new facts which were not within the knowledge of the parties.

4. Accordingly, the Review Application (MD).Nos.200 & 203 of 2025 stands dismissed. No costs.

(Dr.G.J.,J) & (R.P.,J) 15.10.2025 Index : Yes/No.

Internet : Yes/No.

Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order bsm To, The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No.3/4

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

& R. POORNIMA, J.

bsm Rev.Aplc.(MD).Nos.200 & 203 of 2025 15.10.2025 Page No.4/4