Madras High CourtWP(MD)/11919/2016closed

Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai, v. The Inspector General Of

2017-03-20Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.03.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P(MD) No.11919 of 2016 Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai, Nilakottai, (Registration No.46 of 2013), represented by its President, O.S.N.M.Naryanan, S/o.Marimuthu Nadar, Door No.12-1-1A/24, Shanmuga Nagar, Nilakottai-624208, Dindigul District. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Pattinapakkam, Chennai-600028.

2. The Registrar, Dindigul.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Nilakottai.

4. Hindu Nadar Educational Trust, represented by its Managing Trustee, A.Suseendran, S/o.Arunachalam, Door No.15-15-16, Mariamman Kovil Street, Nilakottai.

5. A.Suseendran

6. S.P.Pandiyarajan

7. P.R.Suresh Babu

8. N.B.Karumalai Pandiyan ... Respondents Prayer: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.06.2016, requesting him not to register any documents presented https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

by the respondents 4 to 8 as representatives of the schools run by the petitioner society or in the name of the petitioner society invoking Rule 55(c) of the Registration Act 1908. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For R1 to R3 : Mr.D.Muruganandham Additional Government Pleader For R4 to R8 : Mr. M.Ajmal Khan, Senior Counsel for M/s. Ajmal Associates

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed for a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.06.2016, requesting him not to register any documents presented by the respondents 4 to 8 as representatives of the schools run by the petitioner Society or in the name of the petitioner Society invoking Rule 55(c) of the Registration Act 1908.

2. It is represented by the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 8 that already sale deed had been registered during the pendency of the writ petition.

3. In view of the same, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. Therefore, this writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the subsequent action taken by the authorities before the competent Court, if so advised. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Pattinapakkam, Chennai-600028.

2. The Registrar, Dindigul.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Nilakottai.

+1cc to M/s. T.R.JEYAPALAM Advocate in SR. NO.16482 +1cc to SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER in SR. No.16610 AKV/PSD JS/SV.MMS/3P-6C/12.04.2017 W.P(MD) No.11919 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 20.03.2017