S.Mahalakshmi v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.06.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Mahalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

3.Pandiyammal 4.Mayil Vahanan 5.Thangavel 6.Ragupathi 7.M.Peter Sebastien

...Respondents

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to direct the respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry in civil disputes on the basis of the complaint of the 3rd respondent.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Senthil For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Kottaichamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that the respondent police are harassing him in a civil dispute. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), who takes notice for the respondent police submits that based on the complaint of the 3rd respondent, an enquiry was conducted and since it is civil in nature, they are going to close the complaint.

3.Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Government Advocate, this criminal original petition is closed with a direction to the respondent police not to harass the petitioner. 12.06.2025 DSK 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI,J DSK 12.06.2025 4/4