Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15815/2018withdrawn dismissed

Balakrishnan v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-09-05Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL.O.P.(MD)No.15815 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.7004 and 7005 of 2018 Balakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector of Police, Vilakkuthoon Police Station (L&O), Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vilakkuthoon Police Station(Crime) Madurai.

3.P.L.Sundar ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying, to call for the records in C.C.No.56 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai and quash the same.

For Petitioner: Mr.A.Mohamed Yusuf For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Chandra Sekaran Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

When this Court was about to dismiss the Criminal Original Petition on merits, the learned Counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the same and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.At this juncture, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the presence of the petitioner before the Trial Court may be dispensed with.

3.Accepting the said submission, the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court shall be dispensed with on condition that he shall be present for receiving charge sheet, for answering the charges, at the time of questioning under Section https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

313 of CrPC and at the time of passing judgment. 4.The petitioner is directed to give an undertaking in the form of affidavit that the Counsel representing him will cross examine the prosecution witnesses on the day he is examined in chief. The petitioner shall not dispute the identity of the witnesses. If the petitioner adopt any dilatorial tactics, it is open to the Trial Court to insist for his appearance and deal with the petitioner in accordance with the judgment of Supreme Court of India, in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shambunath Singh, reported in JT 2001(4)s SC 319.

5.This Criminal Original Petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (WRITS) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III) To

1. The Inspector of Police, Vilakkuthoon Police Station (L&O), Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Vilakkuthoon Police Station(Crime) Madurai.

3. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

rmi BU/RP/SAR-III :11.10.2018 : 2P/5C CRL.O.P.(MD)No.15815 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.7004 and 7005 of 2018 05.09.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/