← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/1167/2023closed

C. Ponnusamy v. Muthu Krishnan

2023-08-02Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.08.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.1167 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.22218 of 2021 C.Ponnusamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Muthu Krishnan, The Firka Surveyor, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

2.A.Suresh Federik Clement, Tahsildar, Usilampatti.

... Respondents (R2 is suo motu impleaded vide order dated 26.07.2023 in Cont.P.(MD)No.1167 of 2023 by GRSJ) Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for the acts of contempt of court for the disobedience of the order passed in WP(MD).No.22218 of 2021 dated 16-08-2022 on the file of this Court. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mrs.Jessi Jeeva Priya For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, Addl. Government Pleader.

O R D E R

Contending that the order passed by this Court has not been complied with, this contempt petition has been filed. 2.The petitioner wants survey to be done in respect of the petition mentioned property. Without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition was disposed of on 16.08.2022. The jurisdictional Tahsildar after hearing both parties has called upon them to move the jurisdictional Civil Court. Since I had not adjudicated the issue, it is only just and proper that the order which is adverse to the petitioner is put to challenge in an independent writ petition. The petitioner of course will have to make Manoharan as a party to the said writ petition. 2/4

3.Leaving open all the contentions of the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed.

02.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- 1.Muthu Krishnan, The Firka Surveyor, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

2.A.Suresh Federik Clement, Tahsildar, Usilampatti.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias Cont.P.(MD)No.1167 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.22218 of 2021 02.08.2023 4/4