C.Ramesh, S/O.Chellaiha v. The Secretary
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.09.2016
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P(MD) No.12366 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.9385 and 9386 of 2016 and WMP(MD)No.11127 of 2016 C.Ramesh ... Petitioner -vs1. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, No.1, Greams Road, Chennai-2.
2. The Director of Collegiate Education, DMS Complex, College Road, Chennai-6.
3. M.Krishnamoorthy
4. N.Jawahar Benjamin ... Respondents (R3 & R4 impleaded vide order dated 27.09.2016) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for impugned selection list published by the 1st respondent dated 04.07.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to redrawn the selection list for the post of Director of Physical Education with eligible candidates.
For Petitioner :
Mr.M.Saravanakumar For R1 & R2 :
Mr.K.K.Senthil For Impleaded Parties: Mr.V.Panneer Selvam
O R D E R
This petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned selection list dated 04.07.2016 of the 1st respondent for the post of Director of Physical Education with consequential direction to the 1st respondent to redraw the selection list for the post of Director of Physical Education with eligible candidates.
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The case of the petitioner is that he has completed
B.A.Economics in the year 2000, B.PEd in 2003 and M.PEd in 2005 and M.Phil in 2006 in addition to completion of Ph.D. and NET examination; that before the petitioner acquired the qualification of NET, the 1st respondent has published a Recruitment Notification for 43 posts of Director of Physical Education in the 2nd respondent colleges with qualification of M.Phil, in which he has come out successful, but without publishing the result of the oral interview, the 1st respondent has published the lists of selected candidates, which is impugned in this petition.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 would submit that the impugned list of candidates, published by the 1st respondent is only the combined mark statement and not the selection list, as presumed by the petitioner and therefore, the petition may be closed.
5. Recording the said submission, this petition is closed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:
1. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, No.1, Greams Road, Chennai-2.
2. The Director of Collegiate Education, DMS Complex, College Road, Chennai-6.
+ 1 CC TO Mr.M.SARAVANAKUMAR, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 56575 + 1 CC TO Mr.K.K.SENTHIL, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 56866 + 1 CC TO Mr.V.PANNEER SELVAM, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 56949 AR TE/SKS-RR : 11/11/2016 : 2P/6C W.P(MD) No.12366 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.9385 and 9386 of 2016 and WMP(MD)No.11127 of 2016 27.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/