Sasikala v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Sasikala ... Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kutralam Police Station, Tenkasi District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 14.03.2025 and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's application to grant no objection certificate for granting of trade license for the green mango ayurvedic massage centre situated at No.531, Five Falls Main Road, Kutralam in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s. Ezhil Caroline.E For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this court with a grievance that the respondent police have not granted no objection certificate on the petitioner's application for running the green mango ayurvedic massage centre at Kutralam.

2.When this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that the petitioner's request was rejected by the respondent police. 3.Recording the above submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law. The respondent police shall furnish a copy of the rejection order to the petitioner. 23.06.2025 DSK 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kadayam Police Station, Tenkasi District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 23.06.2025 4/4