← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/49/2025dismissed

K.Rajaji v. The Superintendent Of Police

2025-06-05Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI K.Rajaji ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

2.The Tahsildar, Alangulam Taluk, Tenkasi District.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Alangulam Sub Division, Alangulam, Tenkasi District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Alangulam, Tenkasi District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1, 3 and 4 to provide adequate police protection and the 1/5

second respondent to supervise the conduct of the temple festival going to be conducted from 06.06.2025 to 11.06.2025 at Kuruvankottai Village, Alangulam Taluk, Tenkasi District.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.C.Vinayagarajan For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

ORDER

The petitioner, who is claiming to be a trustee of the temple, has filed this petition seeking police protection to conduct festival of Sri Mariamman Temple.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, strong opposition has been made by the learned counsel, who is appearing for one of the villagers by submitting that the petitioner herein has caused damage to the Vinayagar Statue of the Parasakthi Temple, adjacent to the subject temple, for which, a criminal case has been registered as against the petitioner in Cr.No.56 of 2025.

2/5

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents has also confirmed that a criminal case has been registered as against the petitioner.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the said criminal case is foisted one.

5.Be that as it may, the petitioner is facing an allegation that he has damaged Vinayagar statue, attached to the temple and therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to workout his remedy before the competent civil Court.

05.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gns 3/5

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

2.The Tahsildar, Alangulam Taluk, Tenkasi District.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Alangulam Sub Division, Alangulam, Tenkasi District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Alangulam, Tenkasi District.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

gns 05.06.2025 5/5