Paramalai K v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.03.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY K.Paramalai ... Petitioner vs.

1. The District Collector, Collectorate,

2. The Tahsildar, Kamuthi Taluk,

3. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), T.Punnavasal Panchayat Union Office,

4. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Muthukulathur, ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take appropriate steps to lay Thar Road and to provide 1/6

other basic amenities to the petitioner's community people burial ground situated at T.Vallakulam Village, T.Punnavasal Panchayat, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, in light of the representation made by the petitioner dated 08.05.2023 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Feroz Khan For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilakkumar Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take appropriate steps to lay Thar Road and to provide other basic amenities to the petitioner's community people burial ground situated at T.Vallakulam Village, T.Punnavasal Panchayat, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, in light of the representation made by the petitioner dated 08.05.2023 within a time frame.

2.

Though the petitioner sought for the abovesaid prayer, today, when the writ petition was taken up for hearing, learned counsel 2/6

appearing for the petitioner submitted that it is suffice if a direction is issued to the official respondents to consider and dispose of his representation dated 08.05.2023 within a time frame. 3.

Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the representation of the petitioner dated 08.05.2023 would be considered by the concerned respondent and appropriate orders would be passed on its own merits within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

4.

Heard both sides.

5.

Since there is a considerable lapse of time after the earlier representation was made, the petitioner herein is granted liberty to give a fresh representation to the concerned respondent, ventilating his grievances, as expeditiously as possible. On receipt of such a representation, the concerned respondent is directed to consider the same, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner and the private 3/6

respondents, as well as to any other person, who may be interested in the subject matter, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of the representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the same, on its own merits.

6.

With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

[J.N.B, J.] [S.S.Y, J.] 12.03.2025 Index : Yes / No bala To

1. The District Collector, Collectorate,

2. The Tahsildar, Kamuthi Taluk, 4/6

3. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), T.Punnavasal Panchayat Union Office,

4. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Muthukulathur, 5/6

J.NISHA BANU, J.

AND S.SRIMATHY, J.

bala ORDER MADE IN DATED : 12.03.2025 6/6