← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/959/2020dismissed

A.Valliyappan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2020-11-09Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram,Honourable Mrs Justice T. Krishnavalli (Retd.)3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI A.Valliyappan ... Petitioner/Father of the detenue -vs1.The State, represented by The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Namanasamudram Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

3.Muthalagan 4.Sree Ram ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the Petitioner's daughter by name Sowmiya, aged about 21 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharth For Respondents :

Mr.K.Dinesh Babu 1 and 2 Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent-4 : Mr.K.Petchimuthu

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.] This habeas corpus petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the Petitioner's daughter namely, Sowmiya, aged about 21 years before this Court and set her at liberty.

1/3

2.It is the case of the Petitioner that from 24.10.2020, his daughter is missing and in this regard, a complaint was lodged with the second respondent and the same was also registered in FIR in Crime No.l257 of 2020. But no action was taken by the official respondents.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.K.Dinesh Babu, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would state that the detenue is a major, aged about 21 years and she married the fourth respondent on 28.10.2020. The detenue as well as the fourth respondent were produced before this Court through video conferencing from the Additional Public Prosecutor's office and enquiry from the detenue, it reveals that she is a major and she married the fourth respondent on 28.10.2020 in a Vinayagar Temple at Dindigul. It was also registered on 3.11.2020.She would further state that she is not interested to go with her father.

4.In view of the above statement made by the detenue, nothing survives for consideration in this Habeas Corpus petition and accordingly, the same stands closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vsn Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, Government of Tamil Nadu, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Namanasamudram Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

2/3

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

09.11.2020 SSS(CO) KK(27.11.2020) 3P 4C 3/3