← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/23528/2017disposed of

A.Narasinga Perumal v. The Regional Manager,

2018-07-12Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.07.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD) No.23528 of 2017 A.Narasinga Perumal ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Regional Manager National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) 48, (Old-105/106) Mahatma Gandhi Road Post Box No.6074, Chennai-600 034 2.The Manager (NABARD) Flot No.S2, Second Floor Sanjay Apartment B/146(1) N.G.O. 'B' Colony Tirunelveli 3.The Regional Joint Director of Animal Husbandry Tirunelveli 4.The Branch Manager Corporation Bank 1831, Kalapakulam No.769, N.G.O.'A'Colony Thiruvalluvar Street Sankarankovil Tirunelveli District ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to sanction the subsidy amount of Rs.2,68,720/- based on the petitioner's representation dated 21.09.2017, 22.09.2017 and 19.10.2017 in favour of the petitioner's A/c.No.AGTL/01/14002 under fourth respondent's Bank within a stipulated time. For Petitioner :

Mr.P.T.Thiraviam For Respondents :

Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.K.Jagadeesan for R4

ORDER

It is the grievance of the petitioner that his representations dated 21.09.2017, 22.09.2017 and 19.10.2017 seeking subsidy amount https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

of Rs.2,68,720/-, have not been considered by the respondents till date and therefore, he has filed the present writ petition.

2. This Court has not expressed any of its view with regard to the merits of the representations made by the petitioner. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made, the respondents are duty bound to consider the same in one way or the other. Non-consideration of the same would amount to dereliction of ordinary duties of their office and as such, this Court would be justified in invoking its powers conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct them to consider the petitioner's representations within a stipulated time.

3. In view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 21.09.2017, 22.09.2017 and 19.10.2017 on its own merits and take further action in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I) To 1.The Regional Manager, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), 48, (Old-105/106) Mahatma Gandhi Road, Post Box No.6074, Chennai-600 034.

2.The Manager (NABARD), Flot No.S2, Second Floor, Sanjay Apartment, B/146(1) N.G.O. 'B' Colony, Tirunelveli.

3.The Regional Joint Director of Animal Husbandry, Tirunelveli.

+1cc to Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Advocate, SR.No.72712. W.P.(MD) No.23528 of 2017 12.07.2018 KRK https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ RAM/SV/SAR 1/24.07.2018/2P/5C