Aruna v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.07.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Aruna ... Petitioner versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Kulasekaranpatnam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

3. M.M.H.Sabi ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.02.2024 and to direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation dated 12.10.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balakrishnan 1/4

For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a Mandamus, directing the respondent Police to take appropriate action by considering her complaint/representation dated 27.02.2024.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that on the complaint of the petitioner dated 27.02.2024, a case has been registered in Crime No. 159 of 2024 for the offence under Section 420 IPC.

3. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. However, the respondent Police is directed to take necessary action as against the accused.

11.07.2024 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Kulasekaranpatnam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 11.07.2024 4/4