Meyyappan v. The Tahsildhar
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.12.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WP(MD) No.23916 of 2017 Meyyappan ... Petitioner Vs.
The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.
... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.08.2017, within the time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.N.Govardhanan For Respondent - 2 : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen, Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The writ petitioner's case is that his father purchased the subject property from one Muthukaruppan in the name of local deity. The said Muthukaruppan is no more. The writ petitioner's father is also no more.
2.According to the writ petitioner, instead of effecting mutation in favour of the deity patta was changed in some others name. Therefore, he has submitted a representation on 30.08.2017 to the respondent for change of patta. Therefore, the respondent is directed to consider the said representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on or before 31.03.2018. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.
+1cc to Mr.K.N.Govardhanan, Advocate Sr.No.94873 +1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.95102 DSK VB/SV/MMS/SAR4/08/01/2018/1P/4C WP(MD) No.23916 of 2017 22.12.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/