Perumal Samy Nayakar v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.07.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Perumal Samy Nayakar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Revenue Division Office, Dindigul District.

2.The Tahsildar, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to dispose petitioner's representation dated 25.07.2022 submitted in regard to delete the names that are erroneously entered in petitioner patta No.40 based on the proceedings of the 1st respondent passed in Na.Ka.No.156/2021/A1 dated 31.07.2022 within a time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Satheshkumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader 1/3

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The first respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the first respondent to pass order one way or other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

3. The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 03.07.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Revenue Division Office, Dindigul District.

2.The Tahsildar, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul.

2/3

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

rmi 03.07.2024 3/3