Mayaperumal.N v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19.07.2022 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM N.Mayaperumal : Petitioner Vs
1. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Kottaipattinam Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kottaipattinam, Pudukkottai District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Jegathapattinam Police Station, Jegathapattinam, Pudukottai District.
: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission to perform the program of Adal Padal Program on 30.07.2022 night at about 06.00 pm to 11.00 pm at Jegathapattinam Post, Sri Arulmigu Karumariyamman Temple, Manalmelkudi Taluk, Pudukottai District and to provide adequate police protection based on the petitioner's representation, dated 14.07.2022. 1/5
For Petitioner : M/s.Sridhar.K, For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to perform the program of Adal Padal Program on 30.07.2022 night at about 06.00 pm to 11.00 pm at Sri Arulmigu Karumariyamman Temple, Manalmelkudi Taluk, Jegathapattinam Post, Pudukottai District and to provide adequate police protection based on the petitioner's representation, dated 14.07.2022.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that temple festival for the temple, by name, Sri Arulmigu Karumariyamman Temple, Manalmelkudi Taluk, Jegathapattinam Post, Pudukottai District 2/5
is going to be held in the month of Aadi. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme on 30.07.2022, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 14.07.2022. But, the respondents have not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.
4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondents have received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc. 007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of 3/5
applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the respondent police is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 14.07.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.
7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.
19.07.2022 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No lr Note:Issue Order copy on 28.07.2022 4/5
V.SIVAGNANAM, J lr To
1. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Kottaipattinam Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kottaipattinam, Pudukkottai District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Jegathapattinam Police Station, Jegathapattinam, Pudukottai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
19.07.2022 5/5