Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12823/2021disposed of

R. Vijayaa v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-10-22Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P(MD)No.12823 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.10.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.12823 of 2021 R.Vijayaa ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell, Pudukottai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell, Pudukottai.

4.Beer Mohammed.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to District the 3rd Respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

For Petitioners : Mr.Poornachandran For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi No.1 to 3 Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking direction to the official respondents not to harass the petitioner on the basis of the complaint given by the fourth respondent herein. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the complaint given by the fourth respondent now has been transferred to the third respondent and the third respondent is harassing the petitioner and interfering with the civil dispute, which involves money transaction between the parties. Similarly, in respect of the land dispute suit in O.S.No.199 of 2020 has been filed by the fourth respondent before the Sub Court, Pudukottai. Even during the pendency of the above said suit, a complaint has been given, based upon which, harassment has been made. 3.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based upon the complaint given by the fourth respondent, enquiry was undertaken by the third respondent and finding that civil suit is also pending before the Sub Court, Pudukottai in O.S.No.199 of 2020, the parties were advised to work out their https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.12823 of 2021 remedy before the pending proceedings. By giving such advice, the complaint given by the fourth respondent came to be closed. 4.Since the complaint has been closed after enquiry by advising the parties to work out their remedy in the pending civil proceedings, nothing survives for further direction. Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vrn NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:- 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell, Pudukottai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell, Pudukottai.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Order made in Crl.O.P(MD)No.12823 of 2021 22.10.2021 VR(CO) GC/UV(01.11.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2